Bhagirath Baria

My photo
The Author of this blog has keen interest in understanding Economics and its implications on the Individual and the Economy as a whole. Has been writing articles and analysis of issues that may skip general observation, but exert deep influence on people's lives and their decisions. Discussions and Debates related to conventional as well as non-conventional Economics is done here. The author of this blog doesn't classify himself to any particular School of thought in Economics. He is tilted toward Mainstream Economics, though has keen interest in a few Heterodox schools too. Wishing all the readers a truly enriching experience.

Visitors

Licensed under Creative Commons

Creative Commons License
Rath & Economics by Bhagirath Baria is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.5 India License.
Based on a work at www.rathandeconomics.blogspot.com.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at www.facebook.com/bhagirath.baria.
Showing posts with label Development Economics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Development Economics. Show all posts

Saturday, February 25, 2012

Commodities, Production & Poverty- Part 1

Commodities. How essential and omnipresent this phenomenon is. It embodies a sort of magical character, phantom-like as Marx would say. A key difference between human species and other animals is that of possession of commodities. Before we embark upon a brief journey about this phenomenon, lets look at the its meaning:

Commodity: 

A Good or Service that has a use-value(utility) for users and an exchange-value(price) on market. Food, House, Cars, Pens, Fan, Tubelight, Petrol, Diesel, Bed, Spoon, Mobiles, Laptops, Facebook, Google, you name it! How fascinating this is. We humans are surrounded by a plethora of commodities. It is the prime objective phenomenon that differentiates us from other animal species.

Human Kingdom vs. Animal Kingdom:

Homo sapiens produce, distribute, exchange and consume commodities(both Goods and Services) on a large scale, not matched by any other organic species. Our lives are 'defined' by the commodities we use. A basic difference between a poor and a rich is the differences in the 'possession and utilization of commodities', isn't it? A rich family would be characterized by qualitatively and quantitatively better consumption as compared to a poor household. Suppose if all had the same houses, cars, &c, i.e. exactly same amenities. there wouldn't be any differentiation in rich and poor.

Of course, some of the readers might argue that its the amount of 'money' owned that makes this difference. I shall have two arguments against this proposition:

1. Money, in itself is not the end- though its a debatable issue in today's commodity fetish society. Its the amount of 'purchasing power' that money commands is what makes it an end; thus in the end the amount of commodities it can purchase.

2. Even if money were an end in itself- again, today this might be so in many cases, still money too is a commodity.  Thus money as an end, is after all a commodity as an end.

Why commodities are essential to human existence?

Commodities give shape to human life. They define our method of survival(even in Darwinian sense). They also smoothen  our organic processes. We wouldn't go in detail of this role of commodities, but briefly putting it, these add to the enrichment and easing of our day-to-day processes; Eg. Sleeping, Eating, Working, Travelling, Communicating, Thinking and so many more. Thus, commodities are very essential for leading a better life- both materially and immaterially. 

Economics and Commodities:

Marx begins in his magnum opus Capital-Volume 1:

"The wealth of those societies in which the capitalist mode of production prevails, presents itself as ―an immense accumulation of commodities, its unit being a single commodity. Our investigation must therefore begin with the analysis of a commodity."(1)

An a priori assertion, though a valuable one. He's one of the few Economists who give a completely fresh way of looking at the society and economy around us. Here, we can understand that accumulation of commodities is an essential feature of a capitalist society. Indeed it is. The prime aim of majority of population is gathering(or in market terms- earning) money, it being a commodity or commodity-buying power. The constant consumption of commodities is what keeps the flow of Economy going. 

A simple model of Economy: The PEDEC model

Production > Exchange > Distribution > Exchange > Consumption   
{PEDEC model}

Two stages are of prime importance. One- Consumption and Two- Production. Production is the source of Consumption and Consumption is the reason for Production.

Thus, we find an interconnected, contradictory but unitary relation between these two processes of Economy. It becomes crucial then, to point out that modern economics is mainly 'Consumption-focused' economic theory. Not just that. We as consumers are hardly concerned about the Production side of the commodity under our scrutiny. What matters is its objective appearance, its use-value and its exchange value.
Production and Economics:

Having said that, Production is still a very important process that needs to be emphasized for a better understanding about the Economy around us. One may call it capitalistic, socialistic, mixed, based on whatever one's ideological standpoint. But, production side of the coin remains equally crucial to focus. Modern Economics is the culmination of years of combustion and application of many competing ideas. Still, the excess focus on Consumption process of the Economy is debatable. 

Production: Two major components:  

We may thus define Production as the expenditure of human labour on natural resources and other raw materials to transform them into consumable commodities. Note that Capital Goods such as Machinary, Equipments, etc. are all the product of human labour. We consider them here as non-natural resources of production. Natural Resources are the Primary source of all the production that occurs. 

Then comes Human labour, that transforms the natural resources into the commodities we use as consumers. Here, we may include the Entrepreneurs who perform specific important functions in the economy(2){more on 'Entrepreneur' in future posts}. Hence, every commodity is a product of many different sorts of labour(3){more on types of labour in future posts}. The pencil that comes in our hand, is but a product of numerous labourers and the expenditure of their labour. The breakfast on our tables is a product of so many labourers. Its fascinating how wonderful the Production process can be if we can just rewind the many economic activities behind any given commodity. Human labour hence is the Secondary source of all production that occurs.

GDP- A mass of numerous commodities:

GDP- Gross Domestic Product, is today the most essential indicator of Economic growth of an Economy. Globally, policy-making is extremely sensitive to GDP growth rate and its trend. Recent RBI's monetary tightening vs. economic growth(4) phenomenon was an important indicator of the importance of GDP and its effects on the growth of a nation.

Let us try to understand GDP's importance from the above discussion we had. GDP, as said above is a mammoth mass of numerous commodities(both Goods and Services) which indicate the available wealth of a nation. This wealth, then has to percolate through the entire economic spectrum of a nation. This shall result  in, argue Macroeconomists, upliftment of the poor section of the society.

If we look at this statement, a crucial fact emerges. A poor is one who has very less or no access to commodities, as simple as this! Lack of commodities and access to them is poverty. The scale of this 'lack of access' may change as per the nation, need, economy, &c. But the fact remains that Poverty removal means enhanced availability of Commodities. Once enough commodities are available to a poor household, they are uplifted from the poverty trap. This availability may be in the form of increased money availability, but as argued above in the beginning, money is but a commodity. 

Hence, the key reason on GDP growth lies in the fact that more the commodities, more its availability, subsequently more access to them for the deprived. Again, access to commodities is an issue that cannot be solved by merely having increased GDP growth. This requires sufficient measures to facilitate percolation of increased wealth to the "Bottom of the pyramid" to quote C.K. Prahald(5). Also, an active and a major involvement of the Private sector is needed. This is possible if rural India is seen as a huge and potential market opportunity, both by the Private and Public sector.

Conclusion

Commodities. How essential and omnipresent this phenomenon is indeed. It provides a fresh new way of looking at Capitalism. They surround us everywhere, that is what differentiates human species from other animal species. Excessive focus on Consumption process in modern economics must give some more space to Production process too. Commodities are not merely the products of the magic of markets, but a product of numerous diversified labourer and representative of expended human labour- including that of the Entrepreneurs.
GDP is a huge mass of commodities of numerous kinds that satisfy human needs. High importance of this measure of economic growth lies in the fact that it can enable enhanced access to commodities for the poor and deprived. Poverty is merely the absence of sufficient commodities to consume. This sufficiency is based on many variables and differ as per the country in question. Both public and private sector must look at Rural India, as brought out by the late C.K. Prahlad in his book "Bottom of the Pyramid", as a huge, untapped market opportunity.


References and Notes:

1. Capital, Volume 1, Karl Marx, 1890, Chapter 1, Section 1, Paragraph 1.

2. Entrepreneurs are Labourers after all. Labour here is used in terms of expenditure of human labour power. In Economics, Labour and Entrepreneurs are two different Factors of Production.

3. Here we refer to concrete labour in Marx's language. This means different types of labour such as weaving, tailoring, singing, &c.

4. Recently, headline inflation came down form +9% levels to below 7% figures. This succeeded a crucial debate nationally about the constraints RBI had over its tightening monetary stance. After more than 13 consecutive hikes in lending rate, RBI had to stop for two major reasons: A). GDP growth constraint and B). Waiting for the lag-effect of tightened policy to show results. Indeed, it has shown positive results, at least for now.

5. Bottom of the Pyramid is an excellent work by a Management Professor- Late Shri C.K. Prahlad. It brings out the hidden, untapped market opportunity in the Rural regions of India which represent a dynamic and a brand-conscious consumer segment. It busts many of the myths about Poor, their consumption habits and much more. Interested readers may purchase it here.

                                *******************************

Saturday, December 31, 2011

Patriotism vs. Nationalism: Minimizing Armies

Image source: http://www.prwatch.org



Introductory note:
Since past few days, it has been noticed that there is a lot of murmuring about Militaries and their utilities for nations of the World. Youngsters are rejoicing the concept of Military and are expressing their perceptions about it. Most of them are very positive about 'expansion' of Indian Military(so are the people of other nations). This post intends to provide a basis for thinking in a better and a much more refined way. It is directed towards Military apparatuses of all the nations worldwide and not just India.

It is my initial assertion that 'smaller', 'qualitatively efficient' and 'effective' Military is a prerequisite for a Nation's security. The problem starts when an expansion-spree begins, as is evident everywhere in the World. This post aims at debunking that, more by using analytical and logical argumentation.

Military- A State Apparatus:

Army, Navy and Air Force together form the Military apparatus of our State(Government). It is a very crucial element in maintaining the Sovereignty of our nation. Many consider it as mutually exclusive from the Legislature, Judiciary & Executive, but it is not so. Military ensures the nation remains safe on its borders, from Foreign aggression. It thus works in coordination and direct command of the Prime authorities of India- namely The President, The PM and Council of Ministers. Military, in India at least, is quite well-controlled by the Ministers(Defense Minister being the prime bridge between Government and Military).

Historic continuance of Militaries:

Since the ages of Kings and Emperors, we've always had in the Indian subcontinent, Kings and Emperors waging wars with each other to grab territories, expand their rule-base, enhance their resources & win wars. Thus a 2 fold utility of Military rose:

1. Offense: Expansion of territories by Emperors and Kings; Waging wars; Increasing resources by snatching it away from other rulers and a few more reasons. This means Armies were there to be used as a tool of aggression.

2. Defense: Protection of territories, Fighting wars to sustain the territory, Protecting precious natural resources by having armed forces and a few more.

Military History of India:

India has one of the longest Military Histories in World. It dates back to several Millennia(1). Its mention as 'Armed Forces' is there in our Vedas and Epics like Ramayana and Mahabharata. India has seen the invasion of a plethora of races in its History- Kushans, Huns, Arabs, Turks, Afghans, Mongols, Moghuls and Europeans. Thus, the concept of having Armed Force is not a new idea for India. Same applies, though in twisted forms, to all the other nations of the World.

Indian Military today:

In modern times, Armed Forces is a large consumer of national Budgetary allocations, called in Indian Budgets as Defense Allocation. Latest data puts it at Rs 1,64,414.49 crore ($36.03 billion) making it the 10th largest Military-budget nation(2). It consumes around 2.2% of GDP and 13.07% of Indian Government spending every year(3). And it is increasing consistently except a few /exceptions.

The 'Arms race' World wide:

All nations today are in a spending-spree. Nations are competing with each other to have the latest and most up-to-date Armed forces ready to face any challenge. U.S., European nations like Germany and France, China, Pakistan, etc. are all in an 'Arms Race'. Competing with each other is the key necessity in order to 'prepare' for any future challenge.

The problem with this race is that it has no end. Its an infinitely adding Monetary addition to the Budgets. Moreover, Defense companies in the developed World keep pushing for the sales of their products. Indeed the Governments demand so, but that's just the Demand =side issue. The Producers too keep innovating and thus while India is going to purchase 4th Generation fighter planes, U.S. is already ready to sell 5th Generation planes. One might point out the Indo-Russian cooperation which recently made the 5th Generation fighters, but they'll be introduced in around 2020 in India. The developed World(France, U.S., etc.) will have 6th or probably 7th Generation fighters ready by then. Its an arms race, Profits are the driving force.

Nations like U.S., France, etc. earn a huge chunk of their Yearly revenues through Defense sales and thus we see France and U.S.(even Russia) bidding for India's Defense purchase of 126 fighter planes. It really makes NO difference whatsoever, even if we were to purchase 100th Generation planes for Military. The reason? Here it is:

x, x+n model:

Basic Mathematics(precisely Arithmetic) may help us here. Suppose a nation A, increases its Spending on its Military apparatus by amount x. Its neighbouring and competing nations(in arms race) will tend to spend an amount that is greater than x, i.e. x+n. n here is the monetary excess as compared to the other competing nation.

This Monetary value 'n' has a tendency to keep rising. We can consider it as an infinitely increasing number. Spending on Defense has been increasing tremendously in India since Independence. Recently, China too expanded its Defense budget, matching that of India(4). This brings out two important variables governing the flow of Defense industry going on:

1. Competition: Every nation has to keep competing with each other in order to gain a competitive advantage in Defense abilities, over the threatening nations,. In case of India, China & Pakistan are two such nations whose Defense spending is a Geo-political signal for Indian policy makers.

2. Insecurity: It is a crucial element of keeping the Competition alive & the Defense industry(mostly in Developed nations and Russia) running smoothly. The moment a nation feels secured, some insecurity ought to creep in to keep the flow moving. Logically it follows, no nation is completely secured today, hence this arms race.

Spending and not an Investment:

Military expenditure is classified as 'Capital Expenditure' and not as Capital Investment. A nation only spends, there are 'no returns' whatsoever. Many people make the incorrect claim by asserting that it will save Billions in future. Its not so. Military expenditure is always a 'wastage' of Financial resources of a nation & only 'increases the probability of a War'. The 'billions saved in future' theory is wrong, nothing is saved. As explained above, x+n shows that 'n' tends to consistently increase. There's no scope for saving anything. Indeed the selling nation makes billions, but the purchasing nations are only at the losing end, feeding the Profit registers of those Corporations and Treasuries of the Developed World.

The Solutions:

Following are some very much applicable solutions:

1. Eliminating the arms race: This can be done only when International Organizations like U.N. intervene, provide a platform for this initiative. The nations currently selling and purchasing Defense products must work closely to reduce their insecurities by exhausting he Diplomatic channels.

2. Robot soldiers: This suggestion may seem odd at first sight, but is a very realistic one. Instead of Human soldiers, with life, emotions, abilities, talents and dreams being wasted in Armed forces, Robots must replace them. These Robot-soldiers would be controlled through some Headquarter by Computers. These robots can then go on wars, every nation can afford to do so. This means 'tremendously reduced' loss of Human lives. It means expanded Social Division of labour. Wars would be much cheaper comparatively, at least in terms of innocent Human lives that are lost when young people die in such a havoc.

Concluding note:

Thus, eliminating the arms race, replacing Human-soldiers with Robot-soldiers, thus letting the currently present Human-soldiers live a better, productive life, is the necessity of modern times. We boast of Technology in almost every sphere of life, Why not here too.


We must be Patriotic and not Nationalist. Service to nation is not about joining Armies. Its called Nationalism, which only harms. Lakhs of youngsters prepare to 'kill' lakhs of youngsters somewhere else, all in the name of nationalism. Its morally incorrect. Rather be Patriotic. Work better, Spread the truth just like the Father of our nation Mahatma Gandhi did, Educate yourselves, Spread creativity, Spread Knowledge and thus make India a better place to live. Rather, lets have an Education race, Health race & alike! 



Ending the discussion with the words of Charles De Gaulle, "Patriotism is when love for your own people comes first; nationalism, when hate for people other than your own comes first." 


References:

(4)- same as 3rd.

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Re-rebuttal to uninformed Opinions about India


Following article is not a discussion on a current issue but a fine view of how ill-informed opinions about our nation 'India' can lead to people claiming Congo & Mongolia of being better in standard of living than India! Here, am putting comments of a netizen who asserted that Congo is better than India in its Standard of Living. Notwithstanding mere measurement units, am putting her rebuttal & then my re-rebuttal here. Look how she makes arguments against assertions I haven't made. Enjoy reading ahead.

Readers may access this argument here. Joanna Liberation makes some dumb assertion about India. Typical sub-standard assertions as evident elsewhere on web.

ISSUE- A netizen asserts that Congo & Mongolia's per-capita GDP is higher than India, using it ironically. This was to undermine India's mammoth developments going on today. Author of the blog Bhagirath Baria replied that this person needs some lessons in Macroeconomics if she's making such blur assertions. Then a rebuttal comes. Re-rebuttal is as below:

To Joanna Liberation: Apology for being late. I didn't get any mail about a comment on the blog, so didn't know about your rebuttal. Am putting you arguments first & then my re-rebuttal-

Joanna: rath_baria, an Indian worker is not better off just because you classify his poor ass together with billion other poor Indian worker asses in one "nation" or "society" abstract group. You may root for national reproductive pride, but I prefer to root for higher standard of living of the working class.

ME: Typical sub-standard stuff I hear from most of the ignorant souls. Your assertion about Higher standard of living. Do you even understand what Higher Standard of Living means? Leave it aside. Do you even know how & when to compare 3 Nations consisting of far differing variables that affect them? Leave it too! Do you even know anything about India except your halo-learning!

One society, One nation. Yes, I classify his poor ass with other billions just as I would classify your ass with the other many asses of the nation you belong to. Or let me assume, you're in a boundary-less 'fantasy', reducing yourself to an individual. If so, there's no point to argue here. We both have different viewpoints then. Still, when you wake up from thy dream, thou shall let me know, we'll argue! And yes, am an ardent Nationalist

I have not asserted anything about India's standard of living. But you have By making 'per capital GDP' as a yardstick, which I must oppose. Per-cap GDP is NOT a measure of Standard of Living, even a student of Macro would know that! Standard of Living consists of many Qualitative variables such as Health, Education, Water supplies, HDI, HPI, GER, etc. India fares far better than Mongolia & Congo.

Higher GDP/capita doesn't mean Higher standard of living per se. Labour Force is tremendously improving here in India, Entrepreneurs are thriving at Bottom of the Pyramid, don't believe? Read "Bottom of the Pyramid" by Prahlad. Health sector has seen Private sector's involvement at huge scale. Costs are coming down. India's a hub of Medical Tourism(Macroeconomics). We have a booming Middle class which every major Foreign corporation wants to grab. We have Consumption boom, We have Infrastructure penetrating rapidly in NER, NW, even in the Central mainland.

Some facts[Just a glimpse]: > Mongolia's GDP(PPP) = $11.018 billion, Congo's GDP(PPP) = $23.117 billion, India's GDP = $1843 billion, > Mongolia's Population: approx. 2.8 million, Congo's Population: approx. 70 million, India's LABOUR FORCE: approx. 450 million! GDP/capita comparisoon is futile here, India's total Labour Force = apporx. 6.2 times bigger than Mongolia's & Congo's TOTAL POPULATION. Don't you see the differences between the variables. Comparing them on your Per-cap GDP yardstick is only to blur the real image. (NOTE: All the data is based on World Bank database)

Congo's population resides in extreme poverty, Mongolia has been under the evil of poverty since 1990. Transition to Market Economy(or I love to assert 'system') is an important reason here. Livestock dependence has been shrinking badly in Mongolia.

Now if you're rejecting or unaware of these facts, I'll thus repeat, Brush up your Macro. About India, please come to India once. I shall be with you & ensure you get to see all that's changing rapidly here. You must observe it by yourself rather than sitting at your home & proclaiming fantasies.

Congo, Mongolia. They are improving, but far from being compared with India. Such comparisons lead to incorrect results.

Joanna: "Abstract groups" like Society, Nation.

ME: What abstract? Such collectives haven't jumped from heaven or hell. They've "Evolved". I do not bother about other nations, but as far as India is concerned, we are a nation because of a long, persistently laborious, repressive & a hard-earned History. India, as such was never thought of as a nation. Its cultural, Social, Geographical & Political diversity was so complex that the Colonial rulers proclaimed that India can never be a single nation. Alas! They've been proven wrong & shall always be.

We(Indians) are a nation because Generations & Generation have gone through this process. Sheer repression of Aristocrat Kings, Emperors & then the Colonial ruler led to a Union of Diversity being formed, slowly & gradually. Even today, India is, by many, called a 'group of many nations'.

These are the facts one needs to know about India, before discussing upon it. As such you have the rights to discuss on anything, but such uneducated arguments as you've made in the reply, would lead to a blurred dialogue.

Read "Modern India" by Bipan Chandra, Read "Freedom at Midnight" by Dominique and Larry, Read "Ancient India": New Research by Upinder Singh, Read "Medieval India" by Mahajan. You'll find most of these on Amazon. Read these. Then make your brazen, false arguments about abstract grouping.


Readers shall be updated about further developments herein. Regards.

Saturday, October 29, 2011

Blog Action Day Blogger

Dear readers, this year, Blog Action Day's theme was "Food". Though I missed it on 16th October, but had already published 2 articles focusing on Food & the greater issue of Agro-reforms in India. Have a look at them.

Article 1: http://rathandeconomics.blogspot.com/2009/12/emergence-fo-2nd-green-revolution-in.html

Article 2: http://rathandeconomics.blogspot.com/2009/12/emergence-of-2nd-green-revolution-in_7411.html

Articles on latest issues will come soon.

Read. Share. Enlighten.