Dear readers, I have prepared a paper on an issue that I consider of primordial importance for theoretical economics. Especially important is its implication for young students of Economics who are introduced to the subject of Economics in a particular manner that systematically blurs the existence of alternative methods and schools. It juxtaposes neo-classical and Keynesian as Economics per se. Moreover, the textbooks of G.S.E.B. and C.B.S.E. do not even admit that they're teaching a particular type of Economic theory and not Economics. Ignorance of such a simple fact leads to what I call 'confusing an epistemological fact for an ontological fact'. Though this paper does not delve in detail on this issue, it still touches upon it to sensitize our young students about the controversial and pluralistic character of the subject.
Kindly find it for download here:
Click on this: Academia.edu page
If that doesn't work, click here:
https://www.academia.edu/6480773/An_Introduction_to_Multiplicity_in_Economics
Critical commentaries, Constructive criticisms, suggestions and feedbacks are open-heartedly welcomed. Do write me about your understanding- whether supportive or critical. Do provide me at least 4 days to reply.
- Warm Regards,
- Bhagirath Baria.
Kindly find it for download here:
Click on this: Academia.edu page
If that doesn't work, click here:
https://www.academia.edu/6480773/An_Introduction_to_Multiplicity_in_Economics
Critical commentaries, Constructive criticisms, suggestions and feedbacks are open-heartedly welcomed. Do write me about your understanding- whether supportive or critical. Do provide me at least 4 days to reply.
- Warm Regards,
- Bhagirath Baria.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I welcome everyone who want to share their views, oppose mine, argue, agree and disagree with me. Request you to refrain from using abusive language and/or controversial language. Rest, the blog is always open for your views.